Skip to main content

NYTimes about Google and monopoly fight

            I was reading "The case against Google" from which several things I never imagined were revealed. Google won the search engine war just because, for one reason, at the time Microsoft was battling a monopoly lawsuit with USA and refrained on hurting Google by using the same tactics used with other competitors during the precedent years.
            The complains about unfair treatments are not coming form users, who are totally unaware of the subtleties of the search engines, but from the companies which are getting users through the search engine. The Shyhook, Yelp, Getty museum examples are eye opening!  If your customers are arriving at your site via Google search, the single pipe could always derail them and sink you page rank. What is next, for your business?
            Why only the EU had the nerve to fine Google with 2.1 billions for monopolistic tactics? There are several possible explanations but the main one is how influential is the lobby of Google, Facebook to silence the anti-trust organization in the US government?
           An interesting paragraph in the story is about the executives exchanging emails recognizing the cash cow they have and how to protect it with any possible change of the rank algorithms or adding slight exceptions regarding competition. It is unsettling because an abrupt upheaval of the search market (dominated by Google and Facebook) will mean a totally distorted reality for ALL users - because the search engines will render a total different image than before - in case the incumbents will not find an elegant way to marginalize the disruptor. Trying to save their business will have repercussions for the digital search for the whole world, less areas were other companies have the dominant position (Yandex in Russia?, Baidu in China).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When gaffes are used strategically

Photo by Kyle Head on Unsplash You probably heard that swimming in rough waters in life will reveal your own character and of all the people with you, caught in that moment. It is always unexpected and, exactly as in movies, it begins with a peaceful background and a monotone sound. Everything is unfolding slowly and without any clues that deep gaps will be revealed in any way. It is like a crack in someone's emotional fabric which becomes a wrecking ball for the characters caught in the event, for a short time span, sufficient to project them on a different life orbit, for good. Some people are calling those events "interventions", others fear them as "dark spots" where secrets are emerging as an iceberg unbalanced by some life event. The repercussions are deep and memorable and entail subsequent turmoils, like a burning lava which will flow down for many days to find a peaceful landscape to cool off. The characters are the same like in normal life ...

The Big Split

Photo by CDC on Unsplash   Detect immunity One of the numbers broadcasted every day is the number of COVID-19 patients who recovered. Instead of being fixed on detecting people with corona virus, we should be fixed on detecting the ones who had a mild version of corona virus or even were asymptomatic. Once we know they can freely move, socially mark them in a certain way (with a special certificate).  They could be the soldiers of opening closed businesses or helping important economic sectors. They are on the other side of the fear, all the COVID-19 restrictions should not apply to them. It is not known for how long is the immunity lasting, but at least, these people should come back and revive the industries and get the jobs and make the economy re-start. It is a small number, but they can propel some ideas for the ones in the isolation (see below). That should be the second most important decision of our governments - detect immunity, instead of just...

The sprint to stop an epidemic - Corona virus

Photo by Trust "Tru" Katsande on Unsplash I was reading about the developing efforts for a vaccine reflected through the stock market. It happened to have a few shares of the VIR Biotechnology ( VIR ) company when the chase of finding a vaccine started. It was an incredible ride, even for a guy accustomed with the up-and-downs of the shares in a company and the political game played when companies are bought or acquired. Just for illustration, please see the chart of this stock for a three month period. There is excitement, at the beginning  of March about the possibility of developing a vaccine for Corona virus, and the stock surpasses 70$/share when before is was lingering under the 17$/share threshold. There are many companies in the race - Moderna ( MRNA ), Gilead ( GILD ), Inovio Pharmaceuticals ( INO ) and probably a few of them will find a virus. What I don't understand is the effort spent in parallel of fighting the same cause. It is a lot of ...