Skip to main content

eBooks and books, what you own and the lifetime of a book

Microsoft just announced that the digital library they launched when eBooks were in vogue is closing the service, with a whimper and a small print saying that they will reimburse the buyers (which if you don't know, some of them already lost their devices and books).

For me, besides the physical act of discovering and buying a book, it has a network effect starting to unfold:
  • I read the book and post about it
  • I recommend the book to my friends and sometimes they borrowed it from me (SOME friends, not any...)
  • sometimes I write small ideas or thoughts spurred by ideas presented in the book
  • I hope that my kids will enjoy some of the books I bought
With an eBook, the problem seems to be that the usage period is your lifetime or the lifetime of the service ( the minimum of them). Yes, you may be able to borrow your book to friends, for limited periods and you can copy and paste, in case you need some content from it. But the bottom limit is that you are paying for a period of time to use the book.

You cannot resell the book, cannot leave it to your children and, in case someone is swallowing the book service, you may receive something back from the initial price you paid.

eBook became the rent equivalent in book land: instead of owning you are renting, for a long period of time.  Already this service is becoming to copy what is happening in any manifestation of "cultural life". Music is not own, is rented, movies are just rented or people are consuming a streaming service. Even the paintings/photos are starting to reach a "fat tail" audience - you get a copy of 1000 signed reproductions, not the original. Less and less people are paying to own but mostly to consume/admire/be close to and have access to "libraries". There are two theories of why is it happening:
  • instead of waiting for the book/picture to become a hit or a miss, democratization is creating revenue in the "fat tail" audience and in the same time produces "waves" at the grass root level
  • the author cruises on an "average" value of the market rather than his reputation being thrown in the lucky/unlucky faction
  • the brokerage companies in the field are not going to pay top dollars for the star creators as long as other creators are bringing in a stream of small revenues - commoditization of the creation act (in any art format)
  • the real value of an art act is no longer proclaimed by the "connoisseurs" but by the numbers of eye-balls (or ads, in the end)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When gaffes are used strategically

Photo by Kyle Head on Unsplash You probably heard that swimming in rough waters in life will reveal your own character and of all the people with you, caught in that moment. It is always unexpected and, exactly as in movies, it begins with a peaceful background and a monotone sound. Everything is unfolding slowly and without any clues that deep gaps will be revealed in any way. It is like a crack in someone's emotional fabric which becomes a wrecking ball for the characters caught in the event, for a short time span, sufficient to project them on a different life orbit, for good. Some people are calling those events "interventions", others fear them as "dark spots" where secrets are emerging as an iceberg unbalanced by some life event. The repercussions are deep and memorable and entail subsequent turmoils, like a burning lava which will flow down for many days to find a peaceful landscape to cool off. The characters are the same like in normal life ...

The Big Split

Photo by CDC on Unsplash   Detect immunity One of the numbers broadcasted every day is the number of COVID-19 patients who recovered. Instead of being fixed on detecting people with corona virus, we should be fixed on detecting the ones who had a mild version of corona virus or even were asymptomatic. Once we know they can freely move, socially mark them in a certain way (with a special certificate).  They could be the soldiers of opening closed businesses or helping important economic sectors. They are on the other side of the fear, all the COVID-19 restrictions should not apply to them. It is not known for how long is the immunity lasting, but at least, these people should come back and revive the industries and get the jobs and make the economy re-start. It is a small number, but they can propel some ideas for the ones in the isolation (see below). That should be the second most important decision of our governments - detect immunity, instead of just...

The sprint to stop an epidemic - Corona virus

Photo by Trust "Tru" Katsande on Unsplash I was reading about the developing efforts for a vaccine reflected through the stock market. It happened to have a few shares of the VIR Biotechnology ( VIR ) company when the chase of finding a vaccine started. It was an incredible ride, even for a guy accustomed with the up-and-downs of the shares in a company and the political game played when companies are bought or acquired. Just for illustration, please see the chart of this stock for a three month period. There is excitement, at the beginning  of March about the possibility of developing a vaccine for Corona virus, and the stock surpasses 70$/share when before is was lingering under the 17$/share threshold. There are many companies in the race - Moderna ( MRNA ), Gilead ( GILD ), Inovio Pharmaceuticals ( INO ) and probably a few of them will find a virus. What I don't understand is the effort spent in parallel of fighting the same cause. It is a lot of ...